Protein Synthesis -Translation and Regulation

Translation of Proteins

Return to The Medical Biochemistry Page

© 1996–2015, LLC | info @


Translation is the RNA directed synthesis of polypeptides. This process requires all three classes of RNA. Although the chemistry of peptide bond formation is relatively simple, the processes leading to the ability to form a peptide bond are exceedingly complex. The template for correct addition of individual amino acids is the mRNA, yet both tRNAs and rRNAs are involved in the process. The tRNAs carry activated amino acids into the ribosome which is composed of rRNA and ribosomal proteins. The ribosome is associated with the mRNA ensuring correct access of activated tRNAs and containing the necessary enzymatic activities to catalyze peptide bond formation.












back to the top

Historical Perspectives

Early genetic experiments demonstrated:

1. The co-linearity between the DNA and protein encoded by the DNA. Yanofsky showed that the order of observed mutations in the E. coli tryptophan synthetase gene was the same as the corresponding amino acid changes in the protein.

2. Crick and Brenner demonstrated, from a large series of double mutants of the bacteriophage T4, that the genetic code is read in a sequential manner starting from a fixed point in the gene, the code was most likely a triplet and that all 64 possible combinations of the 4 nucleotides code for amino acids, i.e. the code is degenerate since there are only 20 amino acids.

The above mentioned experiments only indicated deductive correlation's regarding the genetic code. The precise dictionary of the genetic code was originally determined by the use of in vitro translation systems derived from E. coli cells. Synthetic polyribonucleotides were added to these translation system along with all twenty amino acids. One amino acid at a time was radiolabeled. The first demonstration of the dictionary of the genetic code was with the use of poly(U). This synthetic polyribonucleotide encoded the amino acid phenylalanine, i.e. the resulting polypeptide was poly(F).

The utilization of a variety of repeating di- tri- and tetra polyribonucleotides established the entire genetic code. These results of these experiments confirmed that some amino acids are encoded for by more than one triplet codon, hence the degeneracy of the genetic code. These experiments also established the identity of translational termination codons.

An additional important point to come from these early experiments was that the 5' end of the RNA corresponded to the amino terminus of the polypeptide. This was important since previous labeling experiments had demonstrated that the N-terminus is the beginning of the elongating polypeptide. Therefore, in vitro translation experiments established that the RNA is read in the 5' to 3' direction.

Crick first postulated that translation of the genetic code would be carried out through mediation of adapter molecules. Each adapter was postulated to carry a specific amino acid and to recognize the corresponding codon. He suggested that the adapters contain RNA because codon recognition could then occur by complementarity to the sequences of the codons in the mRNA.

During the course of in vitro protein synthesis and labeling experiments it was shown that the amino acids became transiently bound to a low molecular weight mass fraction of RNA. This fraction of RNAs have been termed transfer RNAs (tRNAs) since they transfer amino acids to the elongating polypeptide. These results indicate that accurate translation requires two equally important recognition steps:

1. The correct choice of amino acid needs to be made for attachment to the correspondingly correct tRNA.

2. Selection of the correct amino acid-charged tRNA by the mRNA. This process is facilitated by the ribosomes which we will discuss below.

Summary of Experiments to Determine the Genetic Code

1. The genetic code is read in a sequential manner starting near the 5' end of the mRNA. This means that translation proceeds along the mRNA in the 5' ——> 3' direction which corresponds to the N-terminal to C-terminal direction of the amino acid sequences within proteins.

2. The code is composed of a triplet of nucleotides.

3. That all 64 possible combinations of the 4 nucleotides code for amino acids, i.e. the code is degenerate since there are only 20 amino acids.

The precise dictionary of the genetic code was determined with the use of in vitro translation systems and polyribonucleotides. The results of these experiments confirmed that some amino acids are encoded by more than one triplet codon, hence the degeneracy of the genetic code. These experiments also established the identity of translational termination codons.

back to the top

The Genetic Code

Shown below are the triplets that are used for each of the 20 amino acids found in eukaryotic proteins. The row on the left side indicates the first nucleotide of each triplet and the row across the top represents the second nucleotide. The wobble position nucleotides are indicated in blue. The three stop codons are highlighted in red.

The codon triplets of the genetic code

back to the top

Characteristics of tRNAs

More than 300 different tRNAs have been sequenced, either directly or from their corresponding DNA sequences. tRNAs vary in length from 60–95 nucleotides (18–28 kD). The majority contain 76 nucleotides. Evidence has shown that the role of tRNAs in translation is to carry activated amino acids to the elongating polypeptide chain. All tRNAs:

1. Exhibit a cloverleaf-like secondary structure.

typical tRNA structure

Structure of a typical tRNA molecule. The common stem-loop domains that form the anticodon loop, the D loop, and the TΨC loop are highlighted. The –CCA– nucleotides shown at the 3' end of the tRNA are added post-transcriptionally to all eukaryotic tRNAs.

2. Have a 5'-terminal phosphate.

3. Have a 7 bp stem that includes the 5'-terminal nucleotide and may contain non-Watson-Crick base pairs, e.g. GU. This portion of the tRNA is called the acceptor since the amino acid is carried by the tRNA while attached to the 3'-terminal OH group.

4. Have a D loop and a TΨC loop.

Structure of dihydrouridine Structure of pseudouridine

Dihydrouridine (D)

Pseudouridine (Ψ)

5. Have an anti-codon loop.

6. Terminate at the 3'-end with the sequence 5'–CCA–3'.

7. Contain 13 invariant positions and 8 semi-variant positions.

8. Contain numerous modified nucleotide bases (see Biochemistry of Nucleic Acids for structures of several modified nucleotides in tRNAs).

back to the top

Activation of Amino Acids

Activation of amino acids is carried out by a two step process catalyzed by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Each tRNA, and the amino acid it carries, are recognized by individual aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. This means there exists at least 20 different aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, there are actually at least 21 since the initiator met-tRNA of both prokaryotes and eukaryotes is distinct from non-initiator met-tRNAs.

Activation of amino acids requires energy in the form of ATP and occurs in a two step reaction catalyzed by the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. First the enzyme attaches the amino acid to the α-phosphate of ATP with the concomitant release of pyrophosphate. This is termed an aminoacyl-adenylate intermediate. In the second step the enzyme catalyzes transfer of the amino acid to either the 2'– or 3'–OH of the ribose portion of the 3'-terminal adenosine residue of the tRNA generating the activated aminoacyl-tRNA. Although these reaction are freely reversible, the forward reaction is favored by the coupled hydrolysis of PPi.

Accurate recognition of the correct amino acid as well as the correct tRNA is different for each aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. Since the different amino acids have different R groups, the enzyme for each amino acid has a different binding pocket for its specific amino acid. It is not the anticodon that determines the tRNA utilized by the synthetases. Although the exact mechanism is not known for all synthetases, it is likely to be a combination of the presence of specific modified bases and the secondary structure of the tRNA that is correctly recognized by the synthetases.

It is absolutely necessary that the discrimination of correct amino acid and correct tRNA be made by a given synthetase prior to release of the aminoacyl-tRNA from the enzyme. Once the product is released there is no further way to proof-read whether a given tRNA is coupled to its corresponding amino acid. Erroneous coupling would lead to the wrong amino acid being incorporated into the polypeptide since the discrimination of amino acid during protein synthesis comes from the recognition of the anticodon of a tRNA by the codon of the mRNA and not by recognition of the amino acid. This was demonstrated by reductive desulfuration of cys-tRNAcys with Raney nickel generating ala-tRNAcys. Alanine was then incorporated into an elongating polypeptide where cysteine should have been.

back to the top

The Wobble Hypothesis

As discussed above, 3 of the possible 64 triplet codons are recognized as translational termination codons. The remaining 61 codons might be considered as being recognized by individual tRNAs. Most cells contain isoaccepting tRNAs, different tRNAs that are specific for the same amino acid, however, many tRNAs bind to two or three codons specifying their cognate amino acids. As an example yeast tRNAphe has the anticodon 5'–GmAA–3' and can recognize the codons 5'–UUC–3' and 5'–UUU–3'. It is, therefore, possible for non-Watson-Crick base pairing to occur at the third codon position, i.e. the 3' nucleotide of the mRNA codon and the 5' nucleotide of the tRNA anticodon. This has phenomenon been termed the wobble hypothesis

Nucleotides that constitute the wobble positions of the codon

Diagram showing the various modified nucleotides of tRNAs that are found in the wobble position in the anticodon. The top half shows the wobble nucleotides of the anticodon in blue and the various nucleotides (in red) of the wobble position of the codon that can be found in non-Watson-Crick base-pairs. The lower panel illustrates the opposite showing the wobble nucleotides of the codon in blue and the associated wobble nucleotides of the anticodon in red.

Now that we have charged aminoacyl-tRNAs and the mRNAs to convert nucleotide sequences to amino acid sequences we need to bring the two together accurately and efficiently. This is the job of the ribosomes. Ribosomes are composed of proteins and rRNAs.

All living organisms need to synthesis proteins and all cells of an organism need to synthesize proteins, therefore, it is not hard to imagine that ribosomes are a major constituent of all cells of all organisms. The make up of the ribosomes, both rRNA and associated proteins are slightly different between prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

back to the top

Order of Events in Translation

The ability to begin to identify the roles of the various ribosomal proteins in the processes of ribosome assembly and translation was aided by the discovery that the ribosomal subunits will self assemble in vitro from their constituent parts.

Following assembly of both the small and large subunits onto the mRNA, and given the presence of charged tRNAs, protein synthesis can take place. To reiterate the process of protein synthesis:

1. Synthesis proceeds from the N-terminus to the C-terminus of the protein.

2. The ribosomes "read" the mRNA in the 5' to 3' direction.

3. Active translation occurs on polyribosomes (also termed polysomes). This means that more than one ribosome can be bound to and translate a given mRNA at any one time.

4. Chain elongation occurs by sequential addition of amino acids to the C-terminal end of the ribosome bound polypeptide.

Translation proceeds in an ordered process. First accurate and efficient initiation occurs, then chain elongation and finally accurate and efficient termination must occur. All three of these processes require specific proteins, some of which are ribosome associated and some of which are separate from the ribosome, but may be temporarily associated with it.

back to the top


Initiation of translation in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes requires a specific initiator tRNA, tRNAimet, that is used to incorporate the initial methionine residue into all proteins. In E. coli a specific version of tRNAimet is required to initiate translation, [tRNAifmet]. The methionine attached to this initiator tRNA is formylated. Formylation requires N10-formy-THF and is carried out after the methionine is attached to the tRNA. The fmet-tRNAifmet still recognizes the same codon, AUG, as regular tRNAmet. Although tRNAimet is specific for initiation in eukaryotes it is not a formylated tRNAmet.

The initiation of translation requires recognition of an AUG codon. In the polycistronic prokaryotic RNAs this AUG codon is located adjacent to a Shine-Dalgarno element in the mRNA. The Shine-Dalgarno element is recognized by complimentary sequences in the small subunit rRNA (16S in E. coli).

The Shine-Dalgarno element in prokaryotic RNAs

The Shine-Dalgarno element is found at the 5' side of each initiator AUG codon in prokaryotic polycistronic mRNAs. This element is complementary to sequences present near the 3'-end of the 16S rRNA of the prokaryotic ribosome.

In eukaryotes, initiator AUGs are generally, but not always, the first encountered by the translational machinery. A specific sequence context, surrounding the initiator AUG, aids ribosomal discrimination. This context is A/GCcA/GCCAUGA/G in most mRNAs and is referred to as the Kozak consensus sequence.

back to the top

Eukaryotic Initiation Factors and Their Functions

The specific non-ribosomally associated proteins required for accurate translational initiation are termed initiation factors. In E. coli they are IFs in eukaryotes they are eIFs. Numerous eIFs have been identified:

Initiation Factor Activity
eIF-1 repositioning of met-tRNA to facilitate mRNA binding
eIF-2 heterotrimeric G-protein composed of α, β, and γ subunits; formation of ternary complex consisting of eIF2-GTP + initiator methionine tRNA (met-tRNAimet); AUG-dependent met-tRNAimet binding to 40S ribosome
eIF-2B (also called GEF) guanine nucleotide exchange factor, composed of 5 subunits: α, β, γ, δ, ε GTP/GDP exchange during eIF-2 recycling; genes encoding the subunits identified as EIF2B1–EIF2B5, mutations in any one of which causes the severe autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder called leukoencephalopathy with vanishing white matter (VWM)
eIF-3, composed of 13 subunits (see below) ribosome subunit anti-association by binding to 40S subunit; eIF-3e and eIF-3i subunits transform normal cells when over-expressed, eIF-3A (also called eIF3 p170) over-expression has been shown to be associated with several human cancers
Initiation factor complex often referred to as eIF-4F composed of 3 primary subunits: eIF-4E, eIF-4A, eIF-4G and at least 2 additional factors: PABP, Mnk1 (or Mnk2) mRNA binding to 40S subunit, ATPase-dependent RNA helicase activity, interaction between polyA tail and cap structure
PABP: polyA-binding protein binds to the polyA tail of mRNAs and provides a link to eIF-4G
Mnk1 and Mnk2
eIF-4E kinases
phosphorylate eIF-4E increasing association with cap structure
eIF-4A ATPase-dependent RNA helicase
eIF-4E (see below) 5' cap recognition; frequently found over-expressed in human cancers, inhibition of eIF4E is currently a target for anti-cancer therapies
4E-BP (also called PHAS) 3 known forms when de-phosphorylated 4E-BP binds eIF-4E and represses its' activity, phosphorylation of 4E-BP occurs in response to many growth stimuli leading to release of eIF-4E and increased translational initiation
eIF-4G acts as a scaffold for the assembly of eIF-4E and -4A in the eIF-4F complex, interaction with PABP allows 5'-end and 3'-ends of mRNAs to interact
eIF-4B stimulates helicase, binds simultaneously with eIF-4F
eIF-5 release of eIF-2 and eIF-3, ribosome-dependent GTPase
eIF-6 ribosome subunit anti-association

back to the top

Activities of eIF-3

The eIF-3 complex is composed of 13 different subunits whose sizes, nomenclature and functions are described in the Table below. The importance of the eIF-3 complex in translation initiation is demonstrated by the fact that assembly of the eIF-2-GTP-met-tRNAimet (the ternary complex), binding of the ternary complex and other components of the 43S pre-initiation complex (PIC) to the ribosome 40S subunit, recruitment of the mRNA to the 43S PIC, and scanning of the mRNA for the initiator AUG codon recognition are all dependent on eIF-3 complex activity. Therefore, primary function of the components of eIF-3 is to act as a scaffold for the assembly of the PIC and this assembled complex is referred to as the multi-initiation factor complex (MFC).

Nomenclature Human subunit designation Function(s)
eIF3A p170 binds 40S subunit, binds eIF-4B, involved in formation of MFC, recruitment of mRNA and the ternary complex
eIF3B p116 binds 40S subunit, involved in formation of MFC, recruitment and scanning of mRNA, recruitment of ternary complex
eIF3C p110 binds 40S subunit, involved in formation of MFC, recruitment and scanning of mRNA, recruitment of ternary complex, recognition of the initiator AUG
eIF3D p66 major mRNA binding subunit
eIF3E p48  
eIF3F p47 proposed to be the binding site for mTOR and p70S6K (see regulation of eIF-4E activity below)
eIF3G p44 binding of eIF-4B
eIF3H p40  
eIF3I p36  
eIF3J p35 binds 40S subunit, involved in formation of the MFC
eIF3K p28  
eIF3L p67  
eIF3M GA17  

back to the top

Specific Steps in Translational Initiation

Initiation of translation requires 4 specific steps:

1. A ribosome must dissociate into its' 40S and 60S subunits.

2. A ternary complex termed the pre-initiation complex is formed consisting of the initiator, GTP, eIF-2 and the 40S subunit.

3. The mRNA is bound to the pre-initiation complex.

4. The 60S subunit associates with the pre-initiation complex to form the 80S initiation complex.

complex processes of translation initiation

Details of the complex processes required for accurate and efficient initiation of translation. Several initiation factors (e.g. eIF-1 and eIF-3) are required to ensure that the 60S and 40S ribosomal subunits remain separated (anti-association) so that new rounds of translation can begin. The ternary complex, composed of GTP bound to the α-subunit of eIF2 and the initiator met-tRNAimet, can engage the 40S subunit. The eIF-4F complex, which comprises the cap-binding factor, eIF-4E, the RNA helicase eIF-4A, and the scaffold subunit, eIF-4G captures an mRNA and brings it to the 40S subunit and the ternary complex. Once the mRNA, 40S and 60S subunits, and the ternary complex all interact the resulting 80S initiation complex constitutes the completion of the process of translation initiation. PABP: poly(A)-binding protein. Although not shown, PABP plays a critical role in translational initiation. PABP functions to interact with the scaffold protein eIF-4G which enhances interaction with eIF-4E allowing eIF-4E to bind the mRNA cap. In addition, PABP is involved in the engagement of the 60S ribosomal subunit to the pre-initiation complex.

The initiation factors eIF-1 and eIF-3 bind to the 40S ribosomal subunit favoring anti-association to the 60S subunit. The prevention of subunit re-association allows the pre-initiation complex to form.

The first step in the formation of the pre-initiation complex is the binding of GTP to eIF-2 to form a binary complex. eIF-2 is composed of three subunits, α, β and γ. The binary complex then binds to the activated initiator tRNA, met-tRNAimet forming a ternary complex that then binds to the 40S subunit forming the 43S pre-initiation complex. The pre-initiation complex is stabilized by the earlier association of eIF-3 and eIF-1 to the 40S subunit.

The cap structure of eukaryotic mRNAs is bound by specific eIFs prior to association with the pre-initiation complex. Cap binding is accomplished by the initiation factor eIF-4F. This factor is actually a complex of 3 proteins; eIF-4E, A and G. The protein eIF-4E is a 24 kDa protein which physically recognizes and binds to the cap structure. eIF-4A is a 46 kDa protein which binds and hydrolyzes ATP and exhibits RNA helicase activity. Unwinding of mRNA secondary structure is necessary to allow access of the ribosomal subunits. eIF-4G aids in binding of the mRNA to the 43S pre-initiation complex.

Once the mRNA is properly aligned onto the pre-initiation complex and the initiator met-tRNAimet is bound to the initiator AUG codon (a process facilitated by eIF-1) the 60S subunit associates with the complex. The association of the 60S subunit requires the activity of eIF-5 which has first bound to the pre-initiation complex. The energy needed to stimulate the formation of the 80S initiation complex comes from the hydrolysis of the GTP bound to eIF-2. The GDP bound form of eIF-2 then binds to eIF-2B which stimulates the exchange of GTP for GDP on eIF-2. The activity called eIF-2B is actually a complex of five subunits identified as α, β, γ, δ, and ε. The GDP for GTP exchange reaction is catalyzed by a sub-complex of the γ and ε subunits. The α, β, and γ subunits form another sub-complex that binds phosphorylated eIF-2α resulting in reduced nucleotide exchange. The phosphorylation of eIF-2α is discussed in the next section. Thus, under conditions where eIF-2α is not phosphorylated is serves as a substrate for eIF-2B but when phosphorylated eIF-2α acts as a competitive inhibitor to eIF-2B activity. When GTP is exchanged eIF-2B dissociates from eIF-2. The overall process of eIF-2B-mediated GTP for GDP exchange in eIF-2 is termed the eIF-2 cycle as shown in the Figure below. This cycle is absolutely required in order for eukaryotic translational initiation to occur.

At this stage the initiator met-tRNAimet is bound to the mRNA within a site of the ribosome termed the P-site, for peptide site. The other site within the ribosome to which incoming charged tRNAs bind is termed the A-site, for amino acid site.

The eIF-2 cycle

The eIF-2 cycle. The eIF-2 cycle involves the regeneration of GTP-bound eIF-2 following the hydrolysis of GTP during translational initiation. When the 40S preinitiation complex is engaged with the 60S ribosome to form the 80S initiation complex, the GTP bound to eIF-2 is hydrolyzed providing energy for the process. In order for additional rounds of translational initiation to occur, the GDP bound to eIF-2 must be exchanged for GTP. This is the function of eIF-2B which is also called guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF).

back to the top

Role of the mRNA Poly(A) Tail in Initiation

As discussed in the RNA Metabolism page, most eukaryotic mRNAs possess a polyadenylated [poly(A)] tail at their 3’ end. One major function of the poly(A) tail is to protect the mRNA from exonuclease degradation. However, an equally significant function is its role in translational initiation. The poly(A) tail has been shown to interact with the 5'-cap structure to synergistically stimulate translation. This interaction is accomplished by the presence of specific RNA-binding proteins called poly(A)-binding proteins (PABPs). Multiple copies of these proteins are found associated with the poly(A) tail of most mRNAs. The PABPs interact with the scaffolding protein, eIF4G, resulting in a circularization of the mRNA leading to juxtaposition of the 5’ and 3’ ends. Humans express four distinct cytoplamic PABPs identified as PABPC1, PABPC3, PABPC4, and PABPC5. The "C" in the acronymn stands for cytoplasmic. The PABPC1 protein is derived from the PABPC1 gene located on chromosome 8q22.2–q23 which is composed of 15 exons the encode a 636 amino acid protein. PABPC1 moves between the cytosol and the nucleus and binds the poly(A) tail of mRNAs in both compartments. PABPC1 is the major poly(A)-binding protein involved in the regulatipon of translational initiation. The PABPC3 gene is located on chromosome 13q12–q13 and is an intronless gene encoding a protein of 631 amino acids. The PABPC4 protein was originally isolated as an inducible RNA-binding protein in T cells and called inducicle PABP (IPABP). The function of PABPC4 is thought to be necessary for stabilization of labile mRNAs in induced T cells. The PABPC4 gene is located on chromosome 1p34.2 and is composed of 16 exons that generate three alternatively spliced mRNAs. The PABPC5 gene is an X-linked gene (Xq21.3) and is composed of 2 exons that encode a 382 amino acid protein.

It is believed that this closed-loop of mRNA improves translational efficiency. One possible mechanism for the improved translation is that the circularized mRNA by facilitates the utilization and/or recycling of 40S ribosomal subunits. Another possible reason for enhanced translation is that only intact mRNAs are efficiently translated thus preventing the generation of potentially dominant-negative forms of a given protein from being translated. Another possible benefit to this closed-loop is that PABP can now participate in the promotion of the association of the 60S ribosomal subunit with the pre-initiation complex. It is also possible that the interaction of PABP with eIF4G might render changes to the overall activity of the eIF4F complex bound to the cap structure.

Recent evidence has demonstrated that mRNA circularization, effected by PABP, is indeed a key step in translation initiation and that this process represents a means to exert control over translation. Two PABP-binding proteins have recently been characterized and called PABP interacting protein 1 and 2 (Paip1 and Paip2). Paip1 interacts with eIF4A and has been shown to enhance translation. On the other hand, Paip2 inhibits the formation of the 80S initiation complex and thus, inhibits translation. Paip2 also competes with Paip1 for binding to PABP and is capable of displacing PABP from the poly(A) tail. Paip2 also competes with eIF4G binding to PABP due to an overlap in the binding sites for these two proteins on PABP. The PAIP1 gene is located on chromosome 5p12 and is composed of 13 exons that generate three alternatively spliced mRNAs. The PAIP2 gene is located on chromosome 5q31.2 and is composed of 6 exons that generate two alternatively spliced mRNAs, both of which encode the same 127 amino acid protein.

Humans also express a nuclear-localized poly(A)-binding protein identified by the acronymn, PABPN1. This protein was identifed after the identification of the original cytoplasmic PABP and was, therefore, originally referred to as PABP2. The PABPN1 gene is located on chromosome 14q11.2 and is composed of 7 exons that encode a protein of 306 amino acids. The primary function of PABPN1 is to control the efficient polymerization of the poly(A) tail ensuring a length of up to 250 nucleotides results. Clinical significance is associated with PABPN1 since the gene belongs to the family of the trinucleotide repeat disorder genes, specifically the polyalanine repeat diseases. The PABPN1 gene contains a GCG (encodes alanine) repeat in the N-terminal end of the coding region. The normal repeat length is 6 copies and expansion results in 8-13 copies. Individuals harboring an expanded repeat suffer from a disorder referred to as oculopharyngeal musclar dystrophy, OPMD. OPMD is an autosomal dominant disorder that manifests later in life with a charactreistic dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and progressive ptosis (drooping) of the eyelids.

back to the top

Cap-Independent (IRES-Mediated) Translational Initiation

Cap-dependent translational initiation represents the primary mechanism for the translation of the vast majority of eukaryotic mRNAs. As discussed above this process involves recognition of the cap structure by the eIF4F cap-binding complex (composed of eIF4A, eIF4E, and eIF4G). Binding of the cap structures is the function of eIF4E, while eIF4G is a scaffolding protein that binds eIF4E, eIF4A and the mRNA. The 40S ribosomal subunit binds a protein complex that includes the ternary complex (eIF2-GTP-tRNAi-met. The assembled protein complex then binds the mRNA at the cap structure and then scans along the mRNA until an AUG start codon is recognized in an appropriate sequence context.

During studies of the picornaviruses (including poliovirus) it was discovered that these viruses could initiate translation, using the host translational machinery, via an internal ribosome entry site (IRES). An IRES is an RNA structure that directly recruits the 40S ribosomal subunits via a mechanism that is independent of both a cap structure and the extreme 5’ end of the viral mRNAs. Subsequently a number of eukaryotic viral mRNAs were shown to utilize cap-independent translational initiation mediated by IRES elements in their mRNAs. IRES elements were found to consist of long (300-500 nucleotides) stretches of highly structured sequences. However, the precise mechanisms by which the various IRES elements recruit the ribosomal machinery is not completely understood. Regardless, the viral IRES elements have been classified into four major structural groups, epitomized by poliovirus (PV; Type 1), encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV; Type 2), hepatitis C virus (HCV; Type 3) and cricket paralysis virus (CrPV; Type 4).

The ability of IRES-mediated translation initiation to occur is strictly dependent on the overall structure of the IRES. Single nucleotide substitutions, as well as small deletions or insertions, can either reduce or enhance the activity of a particular IRES. Given these requirements, it is likely that the IRES functionality may change under differing physiological and/or pathological conditions due to changes in the IRES structure under these differing conditions. Another contributor to IRES function, in some mRNAs (e.g. Myc and BiP) is the poly(A) tail despite being independent of the cap structure. Go to the section above to see the role of the poly(A) tail in cap-dependent translation initiation. In addition, many of the IRES elements function via interactions with several of the initiation factors (eIFs) required for cap-dependent initiation, such as eIF4G.

Several IRES elements require, not only a subset of eIFs, but also certain RNA binding proteins in order to facilitate cap-independent translational initiation. These non-eIF factors are called IRES trans-activating factors (ITAFs). Several ITAFs have been identified including polypyrimidine tract binding protein (PTB, also called hnRNP I), poly(rC) binding protein 2 (PCBP2, also called hnRNP E), hnRNP C1/C2, hnRNP D, upstream of N-ras (Unr), ITAF45, and the lupus autoantigen (La). It is potentially significant that some of these ITAFs are hnRNPs (heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins) since these are a family of proteins involved in pre-mRNA processing, mRNA export, localization, and stability in addition to their roles in translation.

More recently several eukaryotic non-viral genes encoding proto-oncogenes, growth factors, proteins involved in the regulation of programmed cell death (apoptosis), cell cycle progression and stress response have been shown to express mRNA that contain IRES elements in their 5’ untranslated regions (UTRs). The presence of IRES elements in these mRNAs, most of which also harbor a cap structure, allows translation to proceed under conditions where cap-dependent translational initiation is repressed. Thus, the hallmark of IRES-mediated translation is that it allows for enhanced or continued gene expression (at the level of protein synthesis) under conditions where normal, cap-dependent translation is shut-off or compromised. Indeed, IRES elements have been shown to be active during and/or following irradiation, hypoxia, angiogenesis, apoptosis and nutrient (amino acid) deprivation. Thus, IRES-mediated translation initiation represents a regulatory mechanism that allows cells to respond to and cope with various transient stress-related circumstances. Also IRES elements in certain mRNAs is likely to be important for the maintenance of normal physiological processes as well.

Several Examples of Mammalian IRES-Containing mRNAs

Gene Name Protein Class / Activating Conditions Known ITAFs
eIF4G translation  
Apoptotic protease activating factor 1, Apaf1 apoptosis activator; IRES utilization during apoptosis PTB, Unr, DAP5
X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein, XIAP apoptosis inhibitor; IRES utilization during apoptosis La, DAP5, hnRNPC1, hnRNPC2
Bcl-2 apoptosis inhibitor; IRES utilization during apoptosis  
NF-κB repressing factor, NKRF transcription factor, blocks transcription of NF-κB- responsive genes  
FGF-1 growth factor
FGF-2 growth factor hnRNPA1
lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1, LEF-1 transcription factor; IRES utilization during oncogenesis  
vascular endothelial growth factor, VEGF growth factor, stimulates angiogenesis; IRES utilization during hypoxia PTB
hypoxia-inducible factor 1α, HIF-1α transcription factor, regulates expression of genes involved in energy metabolism, angiogenesis, and apoptosis; IRES utilization during hypoxia PTB
Hsp70 chaperone, IRES utilization during heat shock and apoptosis  
immunoglobulin heavy chain-binding protein, BiP (also called glucose-regulated protein 78-kDa, GRP78, and heat-shock 70kDa protein 5, HSPA5 chaperone, IRES utilization during heat shock La, NSAP1

back to the top

Regulation of Translation Initiation: The eIF2α Kinases

Regulation of initiation in eukaryotes is primarily effected by phosphorylation of Ser (S) residues in the α-subunit of eIF-2. Phosphorylated eIF-2, in the absence of eIF-2B, is just as active an initiator as non-phosphorylated eIF-2. However, when eIF-2 is phosphorylated the GDP-bound complex is stabilized and exchange for GTP is inhibited. The exchange of GDP for GTP is mediated by eIF-2B (see section above). When eIF-2 is phosphorylated the α, β, and γ subunit composed sub-complex of eIF-2B binds more tightly slowing the rate of nucleotide exchange. It is this inhibited exchange that affects the rate of initiation. Regulation of translational initiation, via phosphorylation of eIF-2α, occurs under a number of different conditions that include endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, nutrient stress (deprivation or restriction), viral infection, and in erythrocytes as a consequence of limiting heme. Each of these distinct regulatory pathways involves a unique eIF-2α kinase, and there are four of these related kinases known to exist in mammalian cells. Each eIF-2α kinase contains unique regulatory domains that interact with various inducing agents in response to different stress-related conditions.

activities of the eIF2a kinases

The eIF-2α kinases. Each of the various eIF-2α kinases responds to different physiological and/or environmental stressors and induces the phosphorylation of the α-subunit of eIF-2. In the case of nutritional stress or the unfolded protein response (UPR) the phosphorylation of eIF-2α results in the preferential translation of transcription factors (e.g. ATF4) that initiate a pattern of gene expression that allows the cell to respond to the stress or in the case of severe and damaging stress the apoptotic program is triggered. GADD34 is a regulatory subuit of protein phosphatase-1 (PP-1). Transcription of the GADD34 gene by ATF4 allows for a feedback control loop on the level of eIF-2α phosphorylation.

The first eIF-2α kinase identified and characterized was isolated from reticulocyte lysates and shown to be involved in the control of globin mRNA translation in response to deficiency in heme. This kinase (discussed in detail below) is called the heme regulated inhibitor (HRI). The protein is also called the heme controlled repressor (HCR) or the heme controlled inhibitor (HCI). The gene encoding HRI is identified as EIF2AK1.

Viral infection involving double-stranded RNA viruses activates the expression of the interferons which in turn activate the eIF-2α kinase known as PKR (RNA-dependent kinase). PKR is encoded by the EIF2AK2 gene and details of this kinase are described below in the section on Interferon Control of Translation.

Proteins that are destined for secretory vesicles are translated while associated with endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membranes. During translation secreted protein are transported into the lumen of the ER in an unfolded state. Proper folding occurs prior to the transfer of the protein to the Golgi apparatus. Under certain conditions the secretory responses of a cell can exceed the capacity of the folding processes of the ER. Accumulation of unfolded proteins triggers the unfolded protein response (UPR) which is a form of ER stress. The UPR involves different protein effectors allowing the cell to respond appropriately and enhance the processing, assembly, and transport of secreted proteins. Among the proteins activated by the UPR is an eIF-2α kinase termed PERK which is a transmembrane protein kinase associated with the ER. PERK is RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR)-like ER kinase. PERK, also known as PEK (pancreatic eIF-2α kinase), is encoded by the EIF2AK3 gene. The aim of PERK-mediated phosphorylation of eIF-2α is to reduce global protein synthesis allowing the cell time to correct the impaired process of protein folding. In addition to reducing global translation, the activation of PERK results in the preferential translation of a transcription factor identified as ATF4 (activated transcription factor 4). Deficiencies in EIF2AK3 gene which encodes PERK result in the extremely rare autosomal recessive disorder known as Wolcott-Rallison syndrome (WRS). WRS is characterized by dysfunction in specific secretory tissues including the pancreas. The defect in insulin secretion in WRS results in a specific form of neonatal diabetes.

Nutritional deprivation, in particular amino acid deficiency, results in the activation of the fourth eIF-2α kinase known as GCN2. GCN2 is the mammalian homolog of the general control non-derepressible-2 gene first identified in yeast. Mammalian GCN2 is encoded by the EIF2AK4 gene. In addition to nutritional deprivation, GCN2 is induced by UV irradiation, inhibition of proteosome function, and infection by certain viruses. With respect to amino acid deficiency the activation of GCN2 occurs via the binding of uncharged tRNAs to the regulatory domain of the enzyme.

Evidence shows that the activities of PERK and GCN2 work in a concerted fashion to ensure that during periods of extended stress global protein synthesis is inhibited. Under these types of conditions PERK serves a primary inhibitory function while GCN2 serves a secondary inhibitory role allowing for cell cycle arrest in response to ER stress.

The key protein whose translation is activated in response to stress-mediated phosphorylation of eIF-2α is the transcription factor ATF4 (activating transcription factor 4; also known as CREB2: cAMP response element-binding protein 2). In response to ER stress the levels of ATF4 mRNA do not change but the level of the protein increases dramatically, indicative of induced translation. The ATF4 mRNA contains two upstream open reading frames (uORFs) identified as uORF1 and uORF2. uORF1 encodes only three amino acids while uORF2 encodes 59 amino acids and overlaps the first 83 amino acids of the functional ATF4 protein. Examination of the role of these two uORFs in ATF4 translational control using in vitro assays demonstrated that uORF1 serves a positive role in translational control allowing ribosomes to overcome the inhibitory role of uORF2 in response to eIF-2α phosphorylation. Under non-stressed conditions when eIF-2α phosphorylation is low the ribosomes rapidly scan to uORF2 and translation a non-functional protein thus reducing the overall level of functional ATF4 protein. However, in the stressed condition there is less eIF-2-GTP which slows translational initiation allowing ribosomes that have engaged the limited eIF-2-GTP to scan to the correct ATF translational initiation site allowing for increases in functional ATF4 protein. The function of ATF4 is to induce the expression of genes that allow the cell to respond to the stress conditions such as the transcription factors FOS, JUN and C/EBP (CAAT-box/enhancer binding protein). ATF4 translation also activates a feedback regulatory mechanism to control the level of eIF-2α phosphorylation via increased expression of the GADD34 gene (growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible protein 34). GADD34 is a regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase-1 (PP-1) and when the GADD34 gene is activated by ATF4 there is a resultant increase in PP-1-mediated phosphate removal from eIF-2α due to increased GADD34 protein.

back to the top


The process of elongation, like that of initiation requires specific non-ribosomal proteins. In E. coli these are EFs and in eEFs. Elongation of polypeptides occurs in a cyclic manner such that at the end of one complete round of amino acid addition the A site will be empty and ready to accept the incoming aminoacyl-tRNA dictated by the next codon of the mRNA. This means that not only does the incoming amino acid need to be attached to the peptide chain but the ribosome must move down the mRNA to the next codon. Each incoming aminoacyl-tRNA is brought to the ribosome by an eEF-1α-GTP complex. When the correct tRNA is deposited into the A site the GTP is hydrolyzed and the eEF-1α-GDP complex dissociates. In order for additional translocation events the GDP must be exchanged for GTP. This is carried out by eEF-1βγ similarly to the GTP exchange that occurs with eIF-2 catalyzed by eIF-2B.

The peptide attached to the tRNA in the P site is transferred to the amino group at the aminoacyl-tRNA in the A site forming a new peptide bond. This reaction is catalyzed by peptidyltransferase activity which resides in what is termed the peptidyltransferase center (PTC) of the large ribosomal subunit (60S subunit). This enzymatic process is termed transpeptidation. This enzymatic activity is not mediated by any ribosomal proteins but instead by ribosomal RNA contained in the 60S subunit. This RNA encoded enzymatic activity is referred to as a ribozyme.

The elongated peptide now resides on a tRNA in the A site. The A site needs to be freed in order to accept the next aminoacyl-tRNA. The process of moving the peptidyl-tRNA from the A site to the P site is termed, translocation. Translocation is catalyzed by eEF-2 coupled to GTP hydrolysis. In the process of translocation the ribosome is moved along the mRNA such that the next codon of the mRNA resides under the A site. Following translocation eEF-2 is released from the ribosome. The cycle can now begin again. The ability of eEF-2 to carry out translocation is regulated by the state of phosphorylation of the enzyme, when phosphorylated the enzyme is inhibited. Phosphorylation of eEF-2 is catalyzed by the enzyme eEF2 kinase (eEF2K). Regulation of eEF2K activity is normally under the control of insulin and Ca2+ fluxes. The Ca2+-mediated effects are the result of calmodulin interaction with eEF2K. Activation of eEF2K in skeletal muscle by Ca2+ is important to reduce consumption of ATP in the process of protein synthesis during periods of exertion which will lead to release of intracellular Ca2+ stores.  eEF2K itself is also regulated by phosphorylation and one of the kinases that phosphorylates the enzyme is regulated by mTOR (see Regulation of eIF-4E below). In addition, the master metabolic regulatory kinase, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) will phosphorylate and activate eEF2K leading to inhibition of eEF-2 activity.

processes of translation elongation

Steps of translation elongation. Following initiation, the process of translation involves a continuing series of elongation steps. Each step comprises movement of the mRNA through the ribosome so that the tRNA carrying the elongating polypeptide resides within a pocket of the 60S subunit termed the P-site (for peptide site). The elongation factor eEF-1α carries each incoming aminoacyl-tRNA to the A-site (for amino acid site) dependent upon the correct codon-anticodon interactions. The peptide in the P-site is transferred to the amino acid in the A-site through the action of the ribozyme activity known as peptidyltransferase. Following peptide transfer the elongation factor eEF-2 induces translocation of the ribosome along the mRNA such that the naked tRNA is temporarily within the E-site (for ejection site) of the 60S ribosome and the peptidyl-tRNA is moved to the P-site leaving the A-site empty and residing over the next codon of the mRNA. The process continues until a stop codon is encountered.

back to the top


Like initiation and elongation, translational termination requires specific protein factors identified as releasing factors, RFs in E. coli and eRFs in eukaryotes. There are 2 RFs in E. coli and one in eukaryotes. The signals for termination are the same in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. These signals are termination codons present in the mRNA. There are 3 termination codons, UAG, UAA and UGA.

processes of translation termination

Steps of translation termination. Translation termination occurs when a stop codon is encountered within the context of the A-site of the 60S subunit. The termination factor eRF, which binds GTP, then stimulates the peptidyltransferase ribozyme to transfer the peptide, from the tRNA in the P-site, to H2O coupled with the hydrolysis of GTP to GDP + Pi. The peptide is released from the ribosome along with the naked tRNA and eRF-GDP complex. The anti-association factors then promote dissociation of the two ribosomal subunits and the process can begin anew.

In E. coli the termination codons UAA and UAG are recognized by RF-1, whereas RF-2 recognizes the termination codons UAA and UGA. The eRF binds to the A site of the ribosome in conjunction with GTP. The binding of eRF to the ribosome stimulates the peptidytransferase activity to transfer the peptidyl group to water instead of an aminoacyl-tRNA. The resulting uncharged tRNA left in the P site is expelled with concomitant hydrolysis of GTP. The inactive ribosome then releases its mRNA and the 80S complex dissociates into the 40S and 60S subunits ready for another round of translation.

back to the top


Selenium is a trace element and is found as a component of several prokaryotic and eukaryotic enzymes that are involved in re-dox reactions. The selenium in these selenoproteins is incorporated as a unique amino acid, selenocysteine, during translation. A particularly important eukaryotic selenoenzyme is glutathione peroxidase. This enzyme is required during the oxidation of glutathione by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and organic hydroperoxides.

Structure of selenocysteine

Structure of the selenocysteine residue

Selenocysteine incorporation in eukaryotic proteins occurs cotranslationally at UGA codons (normally stop codons) via the interactions of a number of specialized proteins and protein complexes. In addition, there are specific secondary structures in the 3′ untranslated regions of selenoprotein mRNAs, termed SECIS elements, that are required for selenocysteine insertion into the elongating protein. One of the complexes required for this important modification is comprised of a selenocysteinyl tRNA [(Sec)-tRNA(Ser)Sec] and its specific elongation factor identified as selenoprotein translation factor B (SelB). SelB is also commonly called eukaryotic elongation factor, selenocysteine-tRNA-specific (EEFsec or EFsec). The protein that is involved in the interaction of the SECIS element with the (Sec)-tRNA(Ser)Sec if referred to as SECIS binding protein, SBP2. Additional proteins involved in synthesis pathway include two selenophosphate synthetases, SPS1 and SPS2, ribosomal protein L30, and two factors that have been shown to bind (Sec)-tRNA(Ser)Sec identified as soluble liver antigen/liver protein (SLA/LP) and SECp43.

Incorporation of selenocysteine during protein synthesis

Selenocysteine biosynthesis and incorporation. The first steps involve the activation of serine onto the (Sec)-tRNA followed by enzymatic conversion to selenocysteine generating (Sec)-tRNA(Ser)Sec. Next the (Sec)-tRNA(Ser)Sec is bound by SelB and the complex is incorporated into the translational machinery aided by SBP2 (not shown). The elongating protein is transferred to the selenocysteinyl-tRNA via the action of peptidyltransferase as for any other incoming amino acid and normal elongation continues.

back to the top

Regulation of eIF-4E Activity

The cellular levels of eIF-4E are the lowest of all eukaryotic initiation factors which makes this factor a prime target for regulation. Indeed, at least 3 distinct mechanisms are known to exist that regulate the level and activity of eIF-4E. These include regulation of the level of transcription of the eIF-4E gene, post-translational modification via phosphorylation and inhibition by interaction with binding proteins.

Although the exact mechanisms used to upregulate the transcription of the eIF-4E gene are not yet well understood, it is known that exposure of cells to growth factors as well as activation of T cells leads to increased expression of eIF-4E. The proto-oncogene MYC is believed to play a role in the transcriptional activation of eIF-4E as 2 functional MYC-binding sites have been found in the promoter region of the eIF-4E gene. Of significant note is the finding that cells that are stably over-expressing the MYC gene also have enhanced levels of eIF-4E. Quite strikingly it has been shown that promiscuous elevation in the levels of eIF-4E lead to tumorigenesis placing this translation factor in the category of proto-oncogene.

Numerous extracellular stimuli (e.g. insulin, EGF, angiotensin II and gastrin) that exert a portion of their effects at the level of enhanced translation do so by affecting the state of eIF-4E phosphorylation. However, it should be noted that not all signals that lead to increased eIF-4E phosphorylation lead to increased rates of translation. Changes in eIF-4E phosphorylation correlate well with progression through the cell cycle. In resting (G0) cells eIF-4E phosphorylation is low, it increases during G1 and S phase and then declines again in M phase. Phosphorylation of eIF-4E occurs at one major site which is Ser209 (in the human and mouse proteins).

The primary signal transduction pathway leading to eIF-4E phosphorylation is that involving the RAS gene. Many growth factors stimulate activation of RAS in response to binding their cognate receptors. Subsequently, RAS activation leads to the phosphorylation and activation of MAP-interacting kinase-1 (Mnk1) which in turn phosphorylates eIF-4E. Although the exact effect of eIF-4E phosphorylation is not clearly defined, it may be necessary to increase affinity of eIF-4E for the mRNA cap structure and for eIF-4G.

The principal mechanism utilized in the regulation of eIF-4E activity is through its interaction with a family of binding/repressor proteins termed 4EBPs (4E binding proteins) which are widely distributed in numerous vertebrate and invertebrate organisms. In mammalian cells 3 related 4EBPs have been found where 4EBP1 and 4EBP2 are also identified as PHAS-I and PHAS-II (PHAS refers to properties of heat and acid stability).

Binding of 4E-BPs to eIF-4E does not alter the affinity of eIF-4E for the cap structure but prevents the interaction of eIF-4E with eIF-4G which in turn suppresses the formation of the eIF-4F complex (see Table of Initiation Factors above). The ability of 4EBPs to interact with eIF-4E is controlled via the phosphorylation of specific Ser and Thr residues in 4EBP. When hypophosphorylated, 4EBPs bind with high efficiency to eIF-4E but lose their binding capacity when phosphorylated. Numerous growth and signal transduction stimulating effectors lead to phosphorylation of 4E-BPs just as these same responses can lead to phosphorylation of eIF-4E.

There are several signal transduction pathways whose activations lead to phosphorylation of 4E-BPs. These include pathways that lead to activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), the Akt Ser/Thr kinase which is also called protein kinase B (PKB) and the FKBP12-rapamycin-associated protein/mammalian target of rapamycin (FRAP/mTOR) family of proteins. Akt was originally identified as a virally encoded oncogene and there are now at least three members of the PKB/Akt family identified as Akt1, Akt2, and Akt3. The mammalian TOR proteins (mTOR) are homologs of the yeast TOR proteins that were identified in a screen for yeast mutants resistant to rapamycin. Rapamycin gets its name from the fact that the compound was isolated from the bacterium Streptomyces hygroscopicus discovered on Easter Island (Rapa Nui). mTOR is a kinase whose catalytic domain shares significant homology with lipid kinases of the PI3K family.

mTOR is actually a component of two distinct multi-protein complexes termed mTORC1 and mTORC2 (mTOR complex 1 and mTOR complex 2). The activity of mTORC1 is sensitive to inhibition by by rapamycin whereas mTORC2 is not. Within the context of mTOR activity, mTORC1 is the central complex as it is responsible for integrating a diverse series of signal transduction cascades initiated by changes in both intra- and extracellular events. Activation and/or regulation of mTORC1 is involved in the control of cell proliferation, survival, metabolism and stress responses. These events can be triggered by nutrient availability, glucose, oxygen, and numerous different types of cell surface receptor activation, each of which eventually impinge on the activity of mTORC1. The components of mammalian mTORC1 include mTOR, Raptor (regulatory associated protein of TOR), Deptor (DEP domain containing mTOR-interacting protein), mLST8 (mammalian homolog of yeast LST8), and PRAS40 (proline-rich Akt/PKB substrate of 40kDa). Deptor and PRAS40 are inhibitors of mTOR activity within the complex. PRAS40 is a raptor-binding protein that is directly phosphorylated by mTOR, which then prevents PRAS40 inhibition of mTOR.

The components of mammalian mTORC2 include mTOR, Deptor, mLST8, Sin1, Poctor (protein observed with Rictor; also known as PRR5L for proline-rich 5-like protein), and Rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR). mTORC2 is involved in the control of the activity of serum- and glucocorticoid-induced kinase (SGK). Full activation of Akt/PKB requires the involvement of mTORC2.

One of the major effects of insulin is increased protein synthesis and this effect is elicited, in part, via activation of mTOR function. For more information on the regulation of protein synthesis by insulin see the Insulin Action page.

mTOR-mediated regulation of translation

Targets for mTOR regulation of translational initiation and elongation. AMPK: AMP-activated kinase. TSC1 and TSC2: Tuberous sclerosis tumor suppressors 1 (hamartin) and 2 (tuberin); Rheb: Ras homolog enriched in brain; PKB/Akt:pr otein kinase B; 4EBP1: eIF-4E binding protein; p70S6K: 70kDa ribosomal protein S6 kinase, also called S6K; eEF2K: eukaryotic elongation factor 2 kinase.

Regulation of mTOR activity is effected via several mechanisms. Activation of AMPK results in phosphorylation and activation of the TSC1/TSC2 complex which results in inhibition of mTOR. AMPK can also phosphorylate and inhibit mTOR. Conversely, activation of PKB (as in the case of insulin receptor activation) leads to activation of mTOR either by inhibition of the TSC1/TSC2 complex or by phosphorylation and activation of mTOR directly. Activation of mTOR leads to phosphorylation of p70S6K and 4EBP1. The net effect of phosphorylation of 4EBP1 is that it is released from eIF-4E allowing eIF-4E to actively bind eIF-4G and recognize the cap structure of mRNAs. Activated p70S6K phosphorylates and inhibits eEF2K. If eEF2K does not phosphorylate eEF2 then translation elongation proceeds uninhibited.

back to the top

Heme Control of Translation

As discussed above, the regulation of initiation in eukaryotes is effected by phosphorylation of the α-subunit of eIF-2. In red blood cells there is a need to restrict the translation of the globin mRNAs if there is insufficient levels of heme to generate functional hemoglobin. Thus, when heme levels are low an eIF-2α kinase is active to limit translational initiation until there is adequate heme to generate functional hemoblobin. The regulating eIF-2α kinase in this system is called the heme regulated inhibitor (HRI). HRI is also known as the heme controlled inhibitor (HCI) or heme controlled repressor (HCR). The gene encoding HRI is identified as EIF2AK1. When heme levels rise in the red blood cell eIF-2α is protected from phosphorylation by a specific 67kDa protein that associates with the γ-subunit of eIF-2. Removal of the phosphate from eIF-2α is catalyzed by a specific eIF-2 phosphatase which is unaffected by heme. The presence of HRI was first seen in in vitro translation system derived from lysates of reticulocytes. Other stressors that include heat shock and oxidative stress result in activation of HRI in the red blood cell.

Expression of the EIF2AK1 gene is also important in hepatic tissues. In acute heme-deficient states in the liver HRI is activated leading to reductions in global hepatic translational. Additional activators of hepatic HRI include inducers of cytochrome P450 enzymes such as xenobiotics. One important class of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes whose translation is regulated by HRI are the CYP2B family. The CYP2B family includes the phenobarbitol-inducible cytochrome P450 enzymes. Activation of HRI in hepatocytes would normally protect cells by ensuring adequate cellular energy and nutrients during acute heme deficiency. However, in genetically predisposed individuals, such as those with any of several porphyrias, the activation of HRI could lead to global translational arrest of physiologically important enzymes and proteins. This could play a significant role in the severe and often fatal clinical symptoms of the acute hepatic porphyrias.

Heme-mediated control of translation

The regulation of translation by heme regulated inhibitor (HRI). Control of translation by heme is important in erythrocytes since these cells are enucleate and contain primarily globin mRNA. When the level of heme (required for the synthesis of biologically active hemoglobin) is low it would be inefficient for erythrocytes to synthesize globin protein. As the level of heme falls the activity of HRI increases. HRI is a kinase which phosphorylates eIF-2. When phosphorylated, eIF-2 still hydrolyzes bound GTP to GDP and still interacts with eIF-2B (GEF). However, the rate of eIF-2B-mediated GTP exchange is greatly reduced. This renders eIF-2 incapable of being used to form a new ternary initiation complex and translational initiation is reduced. When the level of heme again rises the activity of HCI is reduced and translational initiation is once again active.

back to the top

Interferon Control of Translation

Regulation of translation can also be induced in virally infected cells. It would benefit a virally infected cell to turn off protein synthesis to prevent propagation of the viruses. This is accomplished by the induced synthesis of interferons (IFs). There are 3 classes of IFs. The leukocyte or α-IFs, the fibroblast or β-IFs and the lymphocyte or γ-IFs. IFs are induced by dsRNAs and themselves induce a specific kinase termed RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR) that phosphorylates the α-subunit of eIF-2 thereby shutting off translation in a similar manner to that of stress and heme control of translation. The PKR gene is identified as EIF2AK2.

Additionally, IFs induce the synthesis of 2'-5'-oligoadenylate, pppA(2'p5'A)n, that activates a pre-existing ribonuclease, RNase L. RNase L degrades all classes of mRNAs thereby shutting off host cell translation.

back to the top

Iron Control of Translation

Regulation of the translation of certain mRNAs occurs through the action of specific RNA-binding proteins. Proteins of this class have been identified that bind to sequences in either the 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) or 3'-UTR of target mRNAs. Two particularly interesting and important regulatory schemes related to iron homeostasis encompass an RNA-binding protein that binds to either the 5'-UTR of the ferritin mRNA or to the 3'-UTR of the transferrin receptor mRNA. This RNA-binding protein is called iron response element binding protein (IRBP) and it binds to a specific iron response element (IRE) formed by the overal structure of its target mRNAs. This IRE forms a hair-pin loop structure that is recognized by IRBP. This IRBP is an iron-deficient form of aconitase, the iron-requiring enzyme of the TCA cycle. Humans express two distinct aconitase genes, ACO1 and ACO2. The protein encoded by the ACO1 gene is a cytoplasmic protein that is the IRBP involved in the translational control of the transferrin receptor and ferritin mRNAs. The ACO1 gene located on chromosome 9q21.1 which encodes a protein of 889 amino acids. The protein encoded by the ACO2 gene is mitochondrially localized and is the TCA cycle enzyme.

The transferrin receptor is a protein located in the plasma membrane that binds the protein transferrin. Transferrin is the major iron transport protein in the plasma. When iron levels are low the rate of synthesis of the transferrin receptor mRNA increases so that cells can take up more iron. When iron levels are low, IRBP is free of iron and can therefore, interact with the IRE in the 3'-UTR of the transferrin receptor mRNA. Transferrin receptor mRNA with IRBP bound is stabilized from degradation. Conversely, when iron levels are high, IRBP binds iron then cannot interact with the IRE in the transferrin receptor mRNA. The effect is an increase in degradation of the transferrin receptor mRNA.

A related, but opposite, phenomenon controls the translation of the ferritin mRNA. Ferritin is an iron-binding protein that prevents toxic levels of ferrous iron (Fe2+) from building up in cells. The ferritin mRNA has an IRE in its 5'-UTR. As with the transferrin receptor mRNA, when iron levels are high, IRBP cannot bind to the IRE in the 5'-UTR of the ferritin mRNA. This allows the ferritin mRNA to be translated. Conversely, when iron levels are low, the IRBP binds to the IRE in the ferritin mRNA preventing its translation.

Iron-mediated regulation of ferritin and transferrin receptor mRNAs

The regulation of translation of the ferritin and transferrin receptor mRNAs by iron. Both mRNAs contain stem-loop structures form an iron response element (IRE) that binds the iron response-element binding protein (IRBP). In the case of ferritin mRNA this IRBP stem-loop is in the 5'–untranslated region, whereas in the transferrin receptor mRNA it is in the 3–untranslated region. When iron levels are low, IRBP interacts with the IRE and exerts the controls discussed. However, when iron levels are low the excess iron is bound by the IRBP which causes it to be released from the mRNA and the opposite effects on translation are exerted.

back to the top

Prokaryotic Protein Synthesis Inhibitors

Antibiotics are broadly divided into two categories, the bacteriocidal (bactericidal) compounds and the bacteriostatic compounds. Bacteriostatic compounds do not kill bacteria but instead prevent them from reproducing. The bacteriocidal agents do kill bacteria. Many of the antibiotics reviewed in this discussion are bacteriostatic. The majority of antibiotics that have been developed to interfere with prokaryotic protein synthesis, exert their effects at the level of the functions associated with primarily the large ribosomal subunit (50S) or the small ribosomal subunit (30S). The enzymes that activate the amino acids used in protein synthesis, the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, are not antibiotic targets. By interfering with ribosomal functions, the vast majority of antibiotics interfere with the formation of several distinct components of the translational machinery. These include the 30S pre-initiation complex which comprises the mRNA, the small 30S ribosomal subunit, and the formylated methionine initiator tRNA (fmet-tRNAifmet); the 70S initiation complex which is composed of the 30S pre-initiation complex and the large 50S ribosome; or the processes of peptide elongation. A brief list of several antibiotics is presented in the Table below the following detailed discussion of the major types of large and small ribosomal subunit antibiotics.

Inhibitors of Prokaryotic Large (50S) Ribosomal Subunit Functions

MLS Group: Macrolides

The MLS group of antibiotics includes the macrolides, the lincosamides and the streptogramins. These three families of compounds are structurally distinct, yet they share a common mode of action and show similar antibacterial profiles. The MLS group of compounds interfere with the growth of staphylococci (any of the various spherical Gram-positive parasitic bacteria of the genus Staphylococcus), streptococci (any of the various spherical Gram-positive bacteria of the genus Streptococcus), Mycoplasma (a large genus of bacteria lacking a cell wall), and Campylobacter (the genus of spiral Gram-negative bacteria that are motile due to the presence of flagella). The various MLS class antibiotics are produced by the more than 500 strains of Streptomyces by means of various isoforms of polyketide synthase.

The macrolides belong to the polyketide class of naturally occurring compounds. All of the macrolides are derived from a precursor macrocyclic lactone to which one or more deoxy sugar residues may be attached. The macrolides also include a derivative class of compound called the ketolides. The specific classifications of the macrolides are determined on the basis of the number of atoms in the ring of the macrocyclic lactone which can range from 12 to 17. However, the macrolides used as antibiotics in humans are all derived from the 14-, 15-, or 16-membered marcocyclic lactones. The deoxy sugars attached to the macrocyclic ring include either cladinose or desosamine. All of the macrolides, and semi-synthetic macrolide derivatives, that are formed from the 14- and 15-membered rings contain the suffix -thromycin in the drug name. The macrolides that contain a 14-membered ring include clarithromycin, erythromycin, roxithromycin, and the ketolide semi-synthetic derivatives such as telithromycin. The ketolide derivatives are used primarily to treat respiratory infections and macrolide-resistant bacteria. The macrolides that contain a 15-membered ring include azithromycin which is a semi-synthetic derivative of erythromycin with a methyl-substituted nitrogen atom incorporated into the lactone ring. Azithromycin exhibits a similar spectrum to that of erythromycin, with increased activity against Gram-negative bacteria. The macrolides that contain a 16-membered ring include josamycin, midecamycin, spiramycin and tylosin. However, it should be noted that none of these 16-membered ring macrolides are approved for use in the United States.

Another important macrolide that is not used as an antibiotic is tacrolimus. This drug is a 23-membered ring macrolide isolated from Streptomyces tsukubaensis that is used as an immunosuppressant, principally following allogenic organ transplantation. Tacrolimus is also known as FK-506 or fujimycin.

MLS Group: Lincosamides

The lincosamides have some structural similarities to the macrolides but do not contain the lactone ring. This class of antibiotic consists of lincomycin and its more robust semi-synthetic derivative, clindamycin. Lincomycin was originally isolated from Streptomyces lincolnensis. This bacterium was discovered in a soil sample from Lincoln Nebraska, hence the derivation of its name. The lincosamides are effective against Gram-positive bacteria including Streptococci, Staphylococci, and Mycoplasma. In addition, the lincosamides are effective against Actinomyces, some species of Plasmodium, and against the protozoan Toxoplama gondii. Due to the toxicity spectrum associated with lincomycin use, clindamycin is currently the only lincosamide routinely prescribed. Clindamycin is effective in patients with infections caused by anaerobic bacteria, in some malaria patients, and in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Lincomycin is only utilized to treat patients that are allergic to penicillin or who have contracted an infection by an antibiotic-resistant strain of Gram-positive bacteria.

MLS Group: Streptogramins

The streptogramin family of antibiotics are natural antibiotics produced by various strains of Streptomyces. The streptogramin antibiotics are classified into two distinct groups: streptogramin A and streptogramin B. The first isolated mixture of streptogramins came from Streptomyces graminofaciens found in a soil sample in Texas, hence the derived name of these antibiotics. Although most streptogramins are produced by Streptomyces, other bacterial strains such as Actinoplanes, Actinomadura, and Micromonospora are known to produce streptogramins. Very few streptogramins are utilized as human antibiotics, whereas the majority of these compounds are utilized as growth promoters in animal husbandry. The first streptogramin, virginiamycin, was isolated from Streptomyces virginiae in 1952 from a soil sample of Roanoke, Virginia. The streptogramins function as antibiotics by binding to the 23S rRNA close to the peptidyl transferase center of the 50S subunit. In so doing, these antibiotics block extension of the peptide chain and lead to dissociation of peptidyl-tRNA.

The group A streptogramins are members of the polyketide family synthesized by the bacteria Streptomyces virginiae. Each of the group A streptogramins are composed of a 23-membered polyunsaturated macrolactone ring with peptide bonds. The group B streptogramins are cyclic hexadepsipeptides of the nonribosomal peptide antibiotic family. The major streptogramins of the group A class are virginiamycin M, pristinamycin IIA, and dalfopristin, and those of the group B class include pristinamycin IA, quinupristin, and virginiamycin S. Although the two classes of streptogramin are structurally different, they act synergistically, allowing them to exert greater antibiotic activity than the either class do separately, for example pristinamycin IA + IIA, quinupristin + dalfopristin, and virginiamycin M + S. The pristinamycins are close structural relatives of the virginiamycins and they are highly effective human antibiotics. Pristinamycins are highly active against a wide range of Gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA), vancomycin-resistant strains of Enterococcus faecium (VREF), and drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. In addition to these Gram-positive bacteria, pristinamycin is effective against a few Gram-negative bacteria, such as Haemophilus influenzae and Haemophilus parainfluenzae as well as other pathogens that cause atypical pneumonia such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophila.

The Amphenicols

The amphenicols are a class of antibiotics with a phenylpropanoid structure that function by blocking prokaryotic peptidyltransferase in the 50S ribosome. Amphenicols are effective against a wide variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including most anaerobic organisms. Their activity profile classifies the amphenicols as broad spectrum antibiotics. Chloramphenicol (structure shown in the Table below) was the first isolated amphenicol and was obtained from Streptomyces venezuelae. Chloramphenicol, and its derivatives thiamphenicol and florfenicol, are now chemically synthesized. Due to bone marrow toxicity, chloramphenicol is now very rarely used except for the treatment of brain abscesses and eye infections, or in developing countries because it is inexpensive. The advantage of thiamphenicol is that, despite its inhibitory effect on the red cell count, it has never been associated with aplastic anemia, whereas, florfenicol does carry a risk for development of aplastic anemia. Bacterial resistance to chloramphenicol (and thiamphenicol) is the result of enzymatic modification by chloramphenicol acetyltransferases (CAT). These enzymes covalently link an acetyl group from acetyl-CoA to chloramphenicol, preventing it from binding to the ribosomes. The CAT enzymes do not confer resistance to florfenicol.

Linezolid (Zyvox®)

structure of linezolid

Structure of Linezolid.

Linezolid is a member of a class of drug referred to as the oxazolidinone class. Linezolid is active against most Gram-positive bacteria and is used to treat infections such as pneumonia (especially in a hospital setting), and infections of the skin and blood. Linezolid is used principally to treat vancomycin-resistant strains of Enterococcus (VRE) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureas (MRSA). Enterococci are Gram-positive lactic acid bacteria that belong to the Phylum Firmicutes. The most significant negative side-effect associated with the use of linezolid is myelosuppression, which includes anemia, leukopenia, pancytopenia, and thrombocytopenia. The discontinuance of linezolid results in a return to normal hematological parameters. Therefore, it is highly recommended that patients taking this drug for more than two weeks have their blood counts monitored on a weekly basis.

Inhibitors of Prokaryotic Small (30S) Ribosomal Subunit Functions

The small ribosomal subunit (30S) of prokaryotes is composed of the 16S RNA and several ribonucleoproteins (designated with the letter S followed by their size). The functions of the 30S subunit are inhibited by drugs of the aminoglycoside and tetracycline families.


The aminoglycosides are antibiotics that have been isolated from various strains of Streptomyces or Micromonospora. The names of the drugs isolated from Streptomyces all contain the suffix –mycin, whereas those isolated from Micromonospora all contain the suffix –micin. The aminoglycosides are composed of a 6-carbon aminocyclitol ring (2-deoxystreptamin in many instances) linked by glycosidic bonds to one or more sugar derivatives. The initially characterized aminoglycoside was streptomycin isolated from the actinobacterium Streptomyces griseus. Streptomycin was the first drug found to be effective against tuberculosis. The aminoglycosides exerts bactericidal activity against Gram-negative bacteria and some facultative anaerobic bacilli. These drugs generally are not effective against Gram-positive bacteria nor anaerobic Gram-negative bacteria. In order to gain access to the ribosome, the aminoglycosides must first cross the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) covering (Gram-negative organisms), the bacterial cell wall, and finally the cell membrane. Because of their polarity a specialized active transport process is required for their entry into the bacterium.

Amikacin (synthesized from kanamycin), gentamicin and tobramycin are the major aminoglycosides used in human clinical settings. In addition to these three aminoglycosides, sisomicin, and netilmicin all exhibit an extended spectra that includes Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The additional aminoglycosides, neomycin, framycetin (neomycin B), paromomycin (aminosidine), and kanamycin have broader bacteriocidal spectra than streptomycin that includes several Gram-positive as well as many Gram-negative aerobic bacteria.

The major toxicities reported with the use of the aminoglycosides are nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. A number of therapeutic drugs, such as the aminoglycosides, are toxic to functions of the kidney proximal tubule resulting in renal failure due to acute tubular necrosis with secondary interstitial damage (referred to as renal Fanconi syndrome). In addition to the aminoglycosides, the anti-cancer drugs cisplatin and ifosfamide, the anti-retroviral drug tenofovir, and the anti-convulsant sodium valproate can cause renal Fanconi syndrome. The average frequencies of nephrotoxicity for gentamicin and tobramycin are higher than that for amikacin. The average frequency of ototoxicity is highest for amikacin. Due to the associated nephrotoxicity, renal function should be monitored during therapeutic use of any aminoglycoside. Polyuria, decreased urine osmolality, enzymuria, proteinuria, cylindruria (urinary casts), and increased fractional sodium excretion are indicative of aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity. Aminoglycoside-mediated ototoxicity, usually manifests as either auditory or vestibular dysfunction. Vestibular injury leads to nystagmus, incoordination, and loss of the righting reflex. These effects of aminoglycosides are most often irreversible. In addition to nephro- and ototoxicity, all aminoglycosides, when administered in doses that result in high plasma concentrations, have been associated with muscle weakness and respiratory arrest attributable to neuromuscular blockade. This blockade is due to the chelation of calcium and competitive inhibition of the release of acetylcholine from pre-synaptic neurons.


The tetracyclines are a family of structurally related compounds derived from the polyketide synthesis pathway functioning in various strains of Streptomyces. The name tetracycline is derived from the four-ring carbocyclic skeleton of their structure (see the Table below). The tetracyclines exhibit a broad spectrum of activity, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Tetracycline was an important antibiotic used historically in the treatment of cholera. Today tetracycline is used in humans primarily to treat acne and rosacea. Tetracyclines function as antibiotics by inhibiting the stable binding of aminoacyl-transfer (t)RNA to the bacterial ribosomal A-site resulting in termination of protein synthesis.

back to the top

Eukaryotic Protein Synthesis Inhibitors

Shiga and Shiga-Like Toxins

The Shiga toxins are a family of structurally and functionally related exotoxins whose principal effects are exerted at the level of protein synthesis but are not exclusive to this biochemical pathway. Due to historical perspectives there are numerous related terms that describe these toxin family members. This toxin family includes Shiga toxin from Shigella dysenteriae serotype 1 and the Shiga toxins (Stx) that are produced by enterohemorrhagic strains of Escherichia coli (EHEC). The Shiga toxins in S. dysenteriae and Shiga-like toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) are encoded by a diverse group of lambda bacteriophages. There are seven identified toxins produced in the various strains of STEC.

In 1897 the Japanese microbiologist Kiyoshi Shiga characterized that the bacterium, S. dysenteriae was a major cause of the potentially lethal disorder referred to as dysentery. Dysentery is a form of inflammatory gastroenteritis that can result from bacterial, viral, protozoal, or parasitic worm infection. In 1977, a group of E. coli were identified that produced a toxin whose activity was tested on Vero cells in culture. The toxin killed the Vero cells and so it was termed verotoxin, and the bacteria were termed verotoxin-producing E. coli (VTEC). Several strains of E. coli were identified in the 1980's that produced toxins that were related to Shiga toxin and therefore, these bacteria were named Shiga-like toxin-producing E. coli (STEC). The toxins produced by VTEC and STEC strains of E. coli are now identified with the abbreviation: Stx. Shiga toxin from S. dysenteriae and the E. coli-produced Shiga toxin 1 (Stx1) differ only by a single amino acid. There are two distinct families of E. coli Stx toxins identified as the Stx1 and Stx2 families. The Stx1 family is composed of Stx1 and Stx1c, while the Stx2 family is composed of Stx2, Stx2c, Stx2d, Stx2e, and Stx2f.

The most common strain of STEC causing hemorrhagic colitis in humans is the serotype O157:H7. The O and H designations for strains of E. coli define the O-antigens and the H-antigens, immunologic determinants on the surface of the bacteria. The O-antigens are determined by portions of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) component of the outer membrane. There are several hundred characterized O-antigens. The H-antigens are determined by the bacterial flagella. Up to 15% of patients with hemolytic colitis, due to ingestion of the O157:H7 strain, go on to develop hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS). HUS is characterized by hemolytic anemia, acute renal failure (uremia), and a low platelet count (thrombocytopenia).

Shiga toxin and all of the Stx toxins gain entry into host cells via attachment to the cell surface glycosphingolipid, globotriaosylceramide (Gb3; also known as CD77 or the Pk blood group antigen). Following attachment the toxin is subsequently internalized. The toxin, Stx2e, can also bind to the cell surface glycosphingolipid, globotetraosylceramide (Gb4). Following the binding to Gb3 (or Gb4) receptor molecules, Shiga toxin and the Stx family toxins are internalized by endocytosis from clathrin-coated pits. Although the primary uptake mechanism involves clathrin-coated pits, when clathrin-dependent endocytosis is inhibited, Shiga toxin is still efficiently internalized. Following uptake, Shiga toxins localize to the endosomes and are then transferred to the trans-Golgi network, then to the ER. During membrane transfer host furin endoproteases cleave the toxins into their active forms similar to the process described below for the ADP-ribosylating toxins. Finally the host cell machinery translocates the catalytic A subunit to the cytosol. Shiga toxin and the Stx toxins possess a highly specific RNA N-glycosidase activity that cleaves an adenine base in the 28S rRNA in the large (60S) ribosomal subunit. The 3′ end of the 28S rRNA functions in aminoacyl-tRNA binding, peptidyltransferase activity and ribosomal translation. The result of toxin modification of the 28S rRNA is inhibition of elongation factor-dependent aminoacyl tRNA binding and subsequent peptide elongation resulting in cell death. Although Shiga toxins are extremely potent ribosome-modifying enzymes, their effects within the host cell are not limited to the inhibition of protein synthesis. These toxins exert several different cellular effects, including the induction of cytokine expression by macrophages and the activation of what is referred to as the ribotoxic stress response due to the modification of ribosomes. Following Shiga toxin modification of the 28S rRNA, JUN N-terminal kinase (JNK) proteins and p38 family mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) are activated and the signaling exerted by extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 (ERK1; also known as MAPK3) and ERK2 (also known as MAPK1) are disrupted.

ADP-Ribosylating Pathogens

Bacterial ADP-ribosyltransferase toxins (bARTTs: also called bacterial ADP-ribosylating exotoxins, bAREs) are encoded by a range of bacteria, including the human pathogens, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, Vibrio cholerae, Bordetella pertussis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Clostridium botulinum, and Streptococcus pyogenes, as well as certain strains of Escherichia coli. The bARTT enzymes use a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) donor molecule to catalyze the transfer of the ADP-ribose moiety to a given substrate. The acceptor for these ADP-ribosylation reactions can be an Arg, Asn, Thr, Cys or Gln residue, depending on the individual toxin. Members of the bARTT family catalyze the addition of ADP-ribose on various eukaryotic substrates, including monomeric G-proteins of the RHO family (e.g. Clostridium botulinum toxin), heterotrimeric G-proteins (Vibrio cholerae and Bordetella pertussis toxins) and actin (Clostridium botulinum toxin).

The toxins produced by Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa induce the ADP-ribosylation of the critical protein synthesis elongation factor, eEF-2. The well-characterized toxin produced by Vibrio cholerae (identified as CT) is known to induce the ADP-ribosylation of the α-subunit of a heterotrimeric Gs-type G-protein in the gut resulting in the classic "rice water" diarrhea that is associated with cholera. The major strains of V. cholerae that are the causes of cholera are the O1 and O139 strains. However, an additional toxin produced by several clinical strains of V. cholerae, identified as ChxA-I (encoded by the CHX gene), has been characterized that also induces ADP-ribosylation of eEF-2. The ChxA-I toxin is not produced by the O1 nor the O139 strains of V. cholerae. Strains of Escherichia coli also produce an ADP-ribosylating toxin, termed the heat-labile enterotoxin, that catalyzes the ADP-ribosylation of the same Gs-type G-protein in the gut as does CT. The consequences of the E. coli toxin are often referred to as "traveler's diarrhea".

The site of toxin-induced ADP-ribosylation of eEF-2 was originally discovered from work with C. diphtheriae and shown to be a His residue (715) in eEF-2 that contains a modification that was subsequently termed a diphthamide residue. The precise purpose for the diphthamide residue, in the function of eEF-2, remains elusive. In eukaryotes, there are seven genes that have been identified in the diphthamide synthesis pathway. These genes are identified as DPH1 through DPH7. The first step in diphthamide residue synthesis requires the DPH1 through DPH4 genes, while the second step requires the DPH5 gene. The terminal steps in diphthamide synthesis involves the DPH6 and DPH7 genes. The DPH1 gene has been found to be frequently deleted in ovarian and breast cancer, therefore, this gene is also identified as the OVCA1 (ovarian cancer gene 1) gene. Deletion of the DPH3 gene leads to embryonic death and DPH4 mutants are associated with retarded growth and development. Thus, there is clear evidence for the biological significance of this particular form of modification of eEF-2. The diphthamide residue has also been shown to be important in maintaining translational fidelity since a loss of the modification is associated with elevated frameshifting during protein synthesis.

Diphtheria Toxin

Diphtheria toxin (DT) is encoded on a lysogenic bacteriophage in C. diphtheriae that colonize the upper respiratory tract epithelium. Following bacteriophage lysogeny, C. diphtheriae release DT, which then disseminates throughout the body. DT targets many different tissues through its ability to bind to the ubiquitous heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HB-EGF) receptor. After receptor binding, the DT-receptor complex undergoes clathrin-mediated endocytosis and traffics to an early endosome. Once internalized, DT is processed by host proteases, which results in the formation of a disulfide bonded dipeptide consisting of an A subunit and a B subunit (A-B toxin). Endosomal acidification promotes the insertion of the B subunit into the membrane to deliver the A domain across the endosomal membrane, where reduction of the disulfide bond releases the A domain into the cytosol. The A subunit then catalyzes the ADP-ribosylation of eEF-2 resulting in the inhibition of the function of eEF-2 and consequent inhibition of protein synthesis.

Pseudomonas Toxin

The toxin produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an A-B toxin of 613 amino acids that is closely related to DT. This toxin is referred to as Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin (PE, encoded by the TOXA gene). Despite limited primary amino acid homology, the A domains of PE and DT are structurally related. PE uses low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1) as a host receptor. Like DT, PE is cleaved by a cellular protease and is internalized via clathrin-mediated endocytosis. However, unlike the mechanism for delivery of the A subunit of CT to the cytosol, PE undergoes retrograde trafficking through the Golgi to the ER. Within the ER, reduction of the disulfide bond and use of the cellular ER-associated degradation (ERAD) system enables the A domain to traverse the ER membrane into the cytosol. Once in the cytosol, the PE  A subunit catalyzes the same mechanism as DT, ADP-ribosylation of the diphthamide residue of eEF-2.

back to the top

Antibiotic and Toxin inhibitors of Translation (non-inclusive)

Inhibitor Comments
Chloramphenicol inhibits prokaryotic peptidyltransferase

Structure of chloramphenicol

Streptomycin inhibits prokaryotic peptide chain initiation, also induces mRNA misreading
Tetracycline inhibits prokaryotic aminoacyl-tRNA binding to the ribosome small subunit

Structure of tetracycline

Neomycin similar in activity to streptomycin
Erythromycin inhibits prokaryotic translocation through the ribosome large subunit
Fusidic acid similar to erythromycin only by preventing EFG from dissociating from the large subunit
Puromycin resembles an aminoacyl-tRNA, interferes with peptide transfer resulting in premature termination in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes
Diphtheria toxin protein from Corynebacterium diphtheriae which causes diphtheria; catalyzes ADP-ribosylation and inactivation of eEF-2; eEF-2 contains a modified His residue known as diphthamide, it is this residue that is the target of the toxin

Structure of diphthamide residue

ADP-ribosylated diphthamide residue

Ricin found in castor beans; is a heterodimer of A chain (267 amino acids) and B chain (262 amino acids) proteins; functions similar to shiga toxin of Shigella dysenteriae and the shiga-like toxins of enterhemorrhagic E. coli; the A chain is an N-glycoside hydrolase that catalyzes cleavage of the eukaryotic large subunit 28S rRNA, the B chain is a lectin that binds to galactose residues on cell-surface glycoproteins
Cycloheximide inhibits eukaryotic peptidyltransferase

Structure of cycloheximide

back to the top
Return to The Medical Biochemistry Page
Michael W King, PhD | © 1996–2015, LLC | info @

Last modified: October 11, 2015